Alistair Overeem argues Ramadan is a great way to Dopamine Detox, even if you’re not a Muslim

Former UFC heavyweight champion Alistair Overeem and “The Iceman” Wim Hof tackled some of the most pressing societal issues of our time, including ideological conformity, technology addiction, and health in their conversation recently.

Overeem on “Woke” Ideology and Cancel Culture

Alistair Overeem raised concerns about ideological conformity and the dangers of cancel culture, particularly when dissenting from “woke” perspectives. In a podcast, he expressed frustration, saying:

“If you do not agree with woke, you’re racist or you’re this, you’re that, and then you’re being ignored.”

This remark came as part of a broader discussion about modern challenges, including mental health and technology addiction. Overeem’s critique reflects growing frustrations with the narrowing space for open dialogue in public discourse.

This is a funny take considering Overeem went so far as to claim that a diet change could rectify his daughter’s gender confusion.

“I want my daughter to be happy like that. But I do have a strategy for that. For me it’s very important to investigate whether it comes from her own or whether we are involved in external factors. And I think I’ve already identified the external factors. So I’ve also approached this as a competition. And looking at different requests. I’ve literally contacted people from all over the world. And I have a plan. I think it’s a bit too much to tell you now, because it’s a long plan.”

“I’m just going to see if I can do something with that gender. Look, gender problems are a thing of the past and a lot of young people are suffering from it. So we can all give everyone surgery, but that’s not the solution.”

“Because you change a kind of gender, hormones, you have to keep doing that. So I started looking at other causes. Maybe it’s something, maybe it’s this, maybe it’s food.”

Ramadan, Dopamine Resets, and Digital Detox

Overeem also shared his insights into the Islamic practice of Ramadan, framing it as an ideal opportunity for a health reset. He emphasized that Ramadan’s potential physical and mental benefits are often undermined by constant phone use, which disrupts dopamine regulation.

“I’m actually working with a Muslim group because they’re all doing Ramadan,” Overeem explained. “The prophet Muhammad was wonderful in bringing this ritual which is life-changing, but it’s not happening because the phone is messing it up.”

Overeem’s approach includes limiting screen time to 30 minutes in the morning and 30 minutes in the evening, blending traditional fasting with modern digital detox strategies. This combination, he claims, restores dopamine sensitivity, enhancing the joy of simple experiences.

Wim Hof echoed Overeem’s sentiments on phone addiction, likening it to drug dependency.

“We have all slowly became junkies, fixed towards our next hit, our next opening which comes through the phone,” he stated. Hof argued that phones disrupt sacred practices like Ramadan, preventing users from achieving true spiritual and emotional resets.

However, Hof’s critique of addiction carries a stark irony. His past struggles with alcoholism are well-documented, including claims from his ex-wife, Caroline, and his children. According to a Volkskrant Magazine interview in 2022, Hof admitted:

“I was drinking, at that time. Yes, I was drinking. But I also did my job. Because of her [Caroline], I started drinking, yes.”

Caroline went so far as to claim Hof would drink 6 liters of beer per day.

The juxtaposition of Hof’s past with his current advocacy for mindfulness and discipline raises questions about his role as a critic of modern dependencies.

The Polarized Legacy of Overeem and Hof

While their discussions on health, addiction, and societal challenges have resonated with many, both Overeem and Hof remain polarizing figures. Their critiques of modern society are shadowed by their personal contradictions—Overeem’s controversial views on gender identity and Hof’s history with substance abuse.

These complexities illustrate the difficulty of separating a speaker’s message from their history. While their insights into mental clarity, dopamine resets, and authenticity are valuable, their controversial stances challenge the credibility of their advocacy.

Ultimately, Overeem and Hof’s discussions highlight the paradoxes of human nature: the ability to deliver profound wisdom while grappling with personal imperfections.