John Oliver Reveals The Sackler Family Wanted To Charm Their Way Out Of OxyContin Investigation Backlash

During a recent appearance on comedian Dan Soder’s podcast, John Oliver opened up about his firsthand experiences reporting on the Sackler family, the pharma dynasty behind OxyContin, and what happened when they tried to get ahead of his coverage.

Oliver set the scene by recalling the moment his team was deep in the reporting process. “When we were doing one of the pieces on the Sackler family, I think at one point they called up demanding to come into the office,” he told Soder. “No, you can talk to our researcher on the record.”

What struck Oliver most was not the request itself, but what it revealed about how the family operated. “What was more chilling is you realize that that was their move. We go into the building. You’re not coming in. You can talk to our researcher on the record, you can do that, you can talk to her on background, but no, there’s a process here. If you think this is going to be a charm offensive, please let me save you a trip.”

Soder responded by joking that the family must have thought they could walk in and say, “Have you ever been to our wing in the museum?” Before adding that they created OxyContin and devastated much of the rust belt.

Soder then brought up journalist Beth Macy’s book on the opi*id crisis, noting what stood out to him from his own research. “Something I was fascinated by in talking about the Sackler family was this idea that they would always go, we’ll get out of this like a Houdini.”

Oliver agreed, saying: “Also, there’s the amount of Sacklers who, in the researching, people say, ‘Oh, we’re on a different side of the family.’ Different side of the family. How? And yet, when the inheritance comes down, you all get wet.”

Soder joked: “They go, ‘You’re going to make sure you’re on that side of the family when David passes away.'”

Soder then shared that he used to scroll through a Sackler family member’s social media purely to read the comments, watching them get deleted in real time. Oliver’s response was measured. He said, “At that point, when there was almost nothing to hope for in the way of justice, it felt like that was the most justice you could hope for, a stain. Even if it wasn’t going to be a legal process, you were going to be stained by it.”

He then connected that sentiment to the current political moment, suggesting that for some people in positions of power, a permanent public stain may be the only form of accountability that ever lands.