Joe Rogan Startled to hear SEC Cleared Hawk Tuah Girl in Meme Coin Disaster

A recent development left podcast giant Joe Rogan genuinely startled: the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has reportedly decided not to pursue charges against the viral sensation known as “Hawk Tuah Girl” in connection with a controversial meme cryptocurrency.

During a recent episode of The Joe Rogan Experience, comedian Kurt Metzger broke the news to a visibly surprised Rogan.

“Hawk Tuah has been pardoned,” Metzger said with his signature deadpan delivery.

“Are you joking?” Rogan questioned, clearly caught off guard.

“Nope. Not a pardon technically, but the SEC’s not pressing charges,” Metzger replied. “Which is crazy.”

The viral internet personality rose to fame earlier this year but got swept into controversy after her name and likeness were used to promote a meme coin that eventually tanked—leaving a trail of burned investors and lost money.

“This is why it’s so confusing,” Rogan said. “You have these meme coins, and people are genuinely making millions from them… but it still feels like bulls*it. It’s fake money. Anyone can spin one up and dump it.”

Metzger, never one to mince words, chimed in with some inside-baseball crypto commentary:
“The guys making these coins? They call the people buying them ‘degenerate gamblers.’ That’s what they think of them.”

In one of the episode’s most bizarre twists, Metzger claimed he’d heard “Howie Mandel’s son-in-law is behind Hawk Tuah Coin”, identifying the mystery man only as “DJ something.”

As the conversation shifted to whether the Hawk Tuah Girl herself had any actual involvement, Rogan seemed inclined to defend the 22-year-old:

“She’s like George Foreman with his grill,” Rogan said. “George Foreman didn’t design a grill.”

“That girl probably knows almost nothing,” he added. “She probably knows less than me.”

The SEC’s decision not to press charges adds yet another layer of ambiguity to the ever-blurring boundaries between internet fame, viral trends, and unregulated financial schemes. While meme coins continue to dominate headlines and social media feeds, financial experts warn they remain highly speculative—with little intrinsic value and a high risk of sudden collapse.

  • Chat GPT didn’t take too kindly to losing to Magnus Carlsen – insulted him after

    The world of artificial intelligence just delivered one of the most unintentionally hilarious moments in chess history, and it all started with Magnus Carlsen getting a little bored during his travels.

    The Norwegian chess legend recently decided to test his skills against ChatGPT. The results were nothing short of spectacular – though perhaps not in the way the AI would have hoped. Carlsen didn’t just win; he absolutely demolished the artificial intelligence, capturing every single one of ChatGPT’s pawns while keeping his own pieces completely intact.

    But the real entertainment began after the match ended. Curious about how the AI would assess his performance, Carlsen asked ChatGPT to estimate his classical rating strength based on their game. What followed was a masterclass in unintentional comedy.

    The AI began its evaluation positively enough, praising Carlsen’s grasp of the Philidor Defense and acknowledging his tactical strength. It even noted his precision during the endgame and his ability to spot illegal moves. However, the conclusion left the chess world in stitches.

    “If you played like this consistently in longer time controls, I’d estimate your classical strength to be around 1800-2000 FIDE or USCF. Possibly higher if your opening prep and tactical sharpness hold up under pressure,” ChatGPT confidently declared.

    To put this assessment in perspective, Carlsen currently boasts a FIDE rating of 2839 – a number that places him among the greatest players in chess history. The AI’s estimate would barely qualify him as a decent club player, falling well short of even Master level. The last time Carlsen held a rating in the 2000s was back in 2001, when he was still a teenager learning the game.

    The chess community’s reaction was swift and merciless. Chess.com couldn’t resist the opportunity for some good-natured ribbing, joking, “1800 USCF is really strong, really happy for you bro.”

    Amateur players found the situation equally amusing, with one commenting, “Now THIS is funny. I guess I, as an 1800, am now as good as Magnus Carlsen.”

    Perhaps the most hilarious response came from a user who sarcastically offered encouragement: “Opportunity for improvement, Magnus. You’ll get there someday.”

    The incident highlights a fascinating paradox in modern artificial intelligence. While AI has made tremendous strides since the historic matchup between Garry Kasparov and Deep Blue, it still struggles with accurate self-assessment and evaluation of human performance. Despite being thoroughly outplayed in every aspect of the game, ChatGPT remained blissfully unaware of just how outclassed it had been.

    Some chess enthusiasts seized the moment to conduct their own experiments, testing whether other AI systems like Elon Musk’s Grok 4 would prove more accurate in recognizing Carlsen’s true skill level.

    For now, at least, the reigning chess champion can rest assured that his reputation remains intact – even if one particular AI thinks he has plenty of room for improvement.

  • 73 year old sent $100k in bitcoin to fake Kevin Costner in romance scam gone wrong

    A 73-year-old woman named Margaret packed her suitcases and drove an hour from her rural Southern home to a hotel. She was convinced that she was finally going to meet Kevin Costner.

    After months of exchanging messages with someone she believed was the Oscar-winning actor, she had transferred approximately $100,000 in bitcoin to fund what she thought was his new production company.

    The elaborate deception began on Facebook, where Margaret connected with an account claiming to be the “Yellowstone” star. Despite the obvious red flags that would make most people skeptical about a Hollywood celebrity seeking financial help from a retired office manager, Margaret felt special. More importantly, she was vulnerable – her marriage was crumbling, her career had ended, and her family was occupied with their own lives.

    The scammer had initially discussed flying Margaret to Los Angeles before settling on the hotel meeting in her home state. Margaret had kept her bags packed for weeks, eagerly awaiting their rendezvous. But as she waited anxiously in the hotel room, she received a devastating message: a photo of a mangled car with claims that Costner had been in an accident and couldn’t make it.

    That moment marked the beginning of Margaret’s painful realization. A reverse Google image search revealed the crash photo was circulating widely across the internet. The man she had fallen for and financially supported didn’t exist.

    Margaret’s experience represents a growing epidemic of celebrity-impersonation scams that have caught the attention of Hollywood and law enforcement. These sophisticated operations exploit fans’ emotional connections to their favorite stars, using increasingly advanced technology to create convincing false personas.

    According to FBI supervisory special agent Nick Berta, celebrities face unique challenges in protecting themselves from impersonators. The psychological manipulation employed by these scammers is particularly devastating. Erin West, a former prosecutor from Santa Clara, California, who specializes in high-tech crimes, describes the impact: “The psychological hold they have over people is like nothing I’ve ever seen. It is cult-like. It absolutely overwhelms any type of reasonable thought. They’re able to overcome what humans would normally discern to be a ridiculous situation.”

    Americans reported $672 million in losses to confidence and romance scams in 2024, with people over 60 filing the most complaints and losing the most money – averaging $83,000 per victim. These figures likely underrepresent the true scope of the problem, as many victims like Margaret never report their losses due to shame or lingering hope that their relationship might have been real.

    Recently, A 54-year-old Vancouver man, Roger Winsel, fell victim to a celebrity impersonation scam after believing he was in an online relationship with WWE star Liv Morgan for over six months. Despite being married for 31 years, Roger proposed to the fake account with a $1,200 ring. He even expressed in a disturbing message that his terminally ill wife would soon be “out of the picture.”

    Investigators were alerted by his wife, Lori, who is battling late-stage cancer, after she discovered alarming texts on his phone.

    The speed at which these scams operate is alarming. Social media platforms typically take about 48 hours to process takedown requests, creating a window where scammers can establish contact with victims and move them to private messaging apps like Telegram, where they’re harder to track.

    Hollywood has taken notice of this growing threat. Some 400 performers, including Scarlett Johansson, Common, and SAG-AFTRA president Fran Drescher, have endorsed the No Fakes Act, proposed legislation that would create protections for artists’ voices, likenesses, and images from unauthorized AI-generated deep fakes.

  • New pictures of Big Sean spark ab implant suspicions

    Recent photos of rapper Big Sean have ignited widespread debate across social media platforms, with many users questioning whether his defined abdominal muscles are natural or the result of surgical enhancement. The controversy has drawn comparisons to similar accusations previously leveled against Drake, . The incident is part of a growing trend of skepticism toward celebrity physiques.

    The speculation began when workout videos and photos surfaced showing Big Sean with what some observers describe as “extremely defined abs sitting on top of a bubble gut.” Critics point to the contrast between his visible abdominal definition and his overall midsection appearance as evidence of potential ab implants or surgical enhancement.

    However, fitness experts and commentators are pushing back against these claims, arguing that the accusations reflect unrealistic expectations about natural body composition. Greg Doucette, a prominent fitness influencer, has been particularly vocal in defending Big Sean’s physique as completely natural and achievable through proper diet and exercise.

    When examining Big Sean’s physical development over time in a recent video, photos from 2015 show he has maintained consistent abdominal development throughout his career. This historical evidence suggests his current physique represents natural progression rather than surgical intervention. The earlier images display similar muscle definition, contradicting claims that his abs are artificially enhanced.

    The controversy highlights a shift in how society perceives fitness and body image. As one commentator noted, “The bar has been lowered so bad in 2025 that this is considered to be extreme ab definition.” This suggests that genuine fitness achievements are increasingly met with suspicion rather than recognition.

    Social media comments have been particularly harsh, with users posting reactions like “BBL abs” and “Fake abs is crazy work,” while others question what they perceive as unusual about his body composition. The intense scrutiny reflects how quickly online communities can turn against public figures based on appearance alone.

    Fitness professionals emphasize that Big Sean’s physique represents what many men could achieve with proper training and nutrition. His body fat percentage appears to be in a healthy range, estimated around 15-20%, which naturally allows for abdominal definition while maintaining normal body composition elsewhere.

    This controversy ultimately reflects society’s complicated relationship with fitness, celebrity culture, and authenticity in an age of social media scrutiny.

  • Wife requests half of NBA star’s fortune following 6 month marriage

    Former NBA star Dwight Howard finds himself in the midst of a costly divorce battle after just six months of marriage, with his wife seeking a significant portion of his wealth accumulated over a decorated basketball career.

    Court documents filed in Georgia reveal that Amber Rose Howard, known professionally as Amy Luciani, has petitioned for divorce citing irreconcilable differences. “The marriage is irretrievably broken, there are no prospects for reconciliation,” Amber stated in the legal filing.

    The reality star and rapper is requesting that all marital assets and property be “equitably divided” by the courts, potentially putting a substantial portion of Howard’s estimated $240 million career earnings at stake. Perhaps most concerning for the former NBA center is that sources indicate no prenuptial agreement was signed before the couple exchanged vows.

    In a statement to The Shade Room, Luciani acknowledged the divorce proceedings while expressing surprise at how quickly the news became public. “Although it is true, I am not sure how it got out to the public,” she said. “Still wrapping my head around a lot. Although I know it won’t happen, I hope the public can give us grace and privacy right now.”

    The brief marriage represents a costly misstep for Howard, who earned his fortune through contracts with multiple NBA teams including the Orlando Magic, Los Angeles Lakers, and Houston Rockets during his 18-year professional career. The eight-time All-Star’s wealth accumulation came through not only his playing contracts but also endorsement deals and business ventures throughout his time in the league.

    Without a prenuptial agreement, Howard’s considerable assets earned during his playing days could be subject to division under Georgia’s equitable distribution laws, regardless of the marriage’s brief duration.

    Legal experts note that while six months represents an exceptionally short marriage, the absence of a prenup means Luciani’s claims for asset division and ongoing alimony support will likely be evaluated based on standard divorce proceedings. The court will ultimately determine what constitutes an equitable split of the couple’s marital property and whether temporary or permanent spousal support is warranted.

    The situation serves as a cautionary tale for professional athletes about the importance of financial planning and legal protections when entering into marriage. Howard’s case demonstrates how quickly substantial wealth can be put at risk, even in marriages that dissolve within months rather than years.

    As the divorce proceedings continue through the Georgia court system, Howard faces the prospect of a potentially expensive settlement that could significantly impact his post-basketball financial security. The outcome will likely depend on how the court interprets the brief marriage duration against the substantial assets at stake.

  • NASCAR Driver Lasers Off Tattoos to Better Represent Sponsors

    A NASCAR driver is making headlines not for his performance on the track, but for a personal decision that speaks to the ongoing tension between individual expression and corporate image in professional sports.

    Carson Ware, the 25-year-old Xfinity Series driver, announced this week that he will begin removing his neck and face tattoos through laser treatment, with his first appointment scheduled for next Tuesday. The decision comes as part of his effort to better position himself with current and potential sponsors.

    “After some time thinking, I have decided to remove my neck and face tattoos,” Ware shared on social media. “For those that never judged me because of them, you have no idea what that meant. For those that did, I can’t say I blame you or don’t understand. I want to be able to represent companies in #nascar to the best of my ability, and this decision aligns with that.”

    The North Carolina native, who made his NASCAR debut in 2020, currently drives multiple different cars on the Xfinity Series. Jacob Construction serves as his primary and most consistent sponsor, while he also represents Costa Oil, Hitch Go, Total Wheel Repair, Save 22, and CreaBitty throughout the racing season.

    Ware’s visible tattoos have made him stand out among his more clean-cut competition. He sports ink on his right cheek below the eye and on both sides of his neck, creating a distinctive appearance in a sport traditionally associated with conservative corporate imagery.

    The driver’s career has faced massive challenges beyond his appearance. He was suspended from NASCAR in 2021 following legal troubles, taking him three full years to return to competition. This history, combined with his tattoos, may have created additional barriers in attracting the corporate partnerships that are essential for success in motorsports.

    The tattoo removal process could take years to complete, but Ware appears committed to the transformation. His comments suggest this isn’t just about attracting new sponsors, but also about better representing the companies already supporting his career.

    Despite his decision to remove the tattoos, Ware expressed deep gratitude for those who supported him regardless of his appearance. He recalled a particularly meaningful moment when NASCAR featured him in their Instagram posts before an Xfinity race. “I remember sending the post to my family overwhelmed with excitement and emotions, felt like they accepted me and weren’t hiding it,” he wrote.

    The announcement has sparked discussion among NASCAR fans, with some suggesting creative alternatives. Several supporters proposed that country music star Jelly Roll, who is known for his own extensive tattoos, could sponsor Ware’s car, potentially allowing the driver to keep his ink while still maintaining strong corporate backing.

    While NASCAR has evolved significantly in recent decades, the sport still relies heavily on corporate partnerships where image and brand alignment remain crucial factors.

    Carson Ware’s willingness to undergo what will likely be a lengthy and expensive removal process shows the lengths to which athletes will go to secure their financial future in motorsports. Whether this decision will ultimately lead to increased sponsorship opportunities remains to be seen.