Influencer who sterilized himself with TRT at 14 has a hilarious explanation for why JD Vance will lose the 2028 election to Gavin Newsom

In a conversation that covered looks maxing, testosterone replacement therapy, and various social issues, 19-year-old internet personality Clavicular made bold predictions about the 2028 presidential election. During his discussion with host Michael Knowles, Clavicular declared that Vice President JD Vance has no chance against California Governor Gavin Newsom due to physical appearance alone.

“This next election cycle, who’s going to win? It’s going to be Gavin Newsome against JD Vance because JD Vance is subhuman and Gavin Newsome mogs,” Clavicular stated matter-of-factly when asked about future political races.

When pressed to explain this characterization of the sitting vice president, Clavicular provided specific aesthetic critiques. “He’s got a very short total facial width to height ratio. He’s obese. Very recessed side profile. Whereas Newsome is like 6”3′ Chad.”

The host challenged this assessment, noting that Vance is quite tall and questioning whether physical appearance should determine electoral outcomes. However, Clavicular doubled down on his prediction, going so far as to say he would personally vote for Newsom over Vance.

“I’m voting for Gavin Newsome. You can’t be that subhuman,” he explained, adding that physical attractiveness creates insurmountable advantages in modern politics. “Gavin Newsome absolutely blows fans out of the water with all of these things. It doesn’t really matter.”

Clavicular expanded on this theory by invoking the halo effect, a psychological phenomenon where physically attractive people are perceived more favorably. “Regardless of my opinion, I’m just telling you that because of the halo effect and the subconscious bias, politics is not about good policy anymore. It’s just about rhetoric and presentation.”

When challenged about whether Trump’s 2016 victory was due to policy positions rather than personality, Clavicular insisted that if Trump and Hillary Clinton had switched parties, Trump still would have won based on charisma and appearance alone.

The conversation revealed a deeply cynical view of electoral politics filtered through the lens of physical attractiveness. Clavicular acknowledged that from a policy perspective, Vance would likely align more closely with right-wing voters than Newsom, but maintained this was irrelevant compared to facial harmony and body composition.

The host expressed disagreement with this framework, arguing that Trump won because of substantive policy positions on immigration, economics, and social issues rather than mere personality. Clavicular remained unconvinced, stating that most Trump voters don’t even know what the former president stands for.